![]() The Traffic Accident Reconstruction Origin -ARnews-
|
![]() |
On my beat is an older 2 lane roadway, surveyed and posted for 35 mph. At one point this road crests a rise, then DROPS. At that point sight distance is easily less than 100 feet, perhaps as little as 50... and- at least in my opinion, as you approach this situation there's adequate time and distance to see that the world just plain ends just ahead...even absent the warning signs and flashing lights and reduced speed advisories - would it be reasonable to expect a driver traveling at the posted 35 MPH speed limit to to continue blithely over the precipice at that speed? Is it reasonable for that driver, to say to himself, "I can't see a thing, but the sign back there said '35'..."?
you have to look beyond the posting and the design standards and put youself in the driver's seat (how quaint...) and try to objectively decide what's reasonable given the totality of the circumstances...
At some point, if your still asking, then you may be asking a question for a jury to decide, or need to reseach case law rather than design standards.
ask a simple question....
Rod Macdonald
frmrmtr@aol.com
For example, to continue this discussion look for a thread titled
stopping sight distance
If this thread does not exist in the current archive, you can begin another one by using that title.