![]() The Traffic Accident Reconstruction Origin -ARnews-
|
![]() |
Overall, my impression is that fatality is an outcome arising from injury
while injury is the actual outcome of the force, acceleration or Delta-V.
There are many instances where the outcome "fatality" can occur which
may not match well with the magnitude of the injury. From a simple
example, a laceration at a blood vessel can result in fatality if
treatment is unavailable. But what about age, frailty, body type, manner
of seat-belt use, and so on and so on.... It the end, the Delta-V at
fatality occurs in real life collisions is really a distribution, not
a descrete number.
I recall a Swedish study noted that a seat-belt restrained driver had
died in a 12 mph Delta-V. In other real-life collisions, involving
longer ride-down times, occupants have survived tremendous Delta-Vs that
would seem impossible in a controlled-test, 30 mph barrier impact.
In my experience Delta-Vs in the 20 to 30 mph range can begin to create
"complicated" injuries of the soft-tissues (abdominal organs, lungs,
aeortic tears) if the seat-belt is mis-positioned or worn with slack.
These injuries would be classified as AIS-3 and higher on the
Abbreviated Injury Scale. But don't quote me as I am simply going from
memory. In reality, a well-positioned seat-belt would not expect to
produce such injuries below a 30 mph Delta-V. But in real life everything
depends and nothing is sacred. A frail 75-year-old female is different
than the 21-year-old body-builder. The impact into a farmer's haystack
is different than the impact of a bridge abutment.
Check the STAPP, SAE, AAAM...proceedings. At last resort contact someone
like Murray Dance at Transport Canada, Ottawa. Canada has been living
with manditory seat-belts use since about 1976 and Murray has had to
review a lot of the more sensational or unusual seat-belt cases.
Zygmunt M. Gorski
gorski@golden.net