The Traffic Accident Reconstruction Origin -ARnews-

Prooving car was stationary

Jerome Breslin (jbreslin@pathcom.com)
Sun, 1 Sep 1996 10:46:12 -0400 (EDT)

Hello

I was wondering whether the following information is sufficient to prove
which of two cars was stationary during a collision.

Car A and Car B collide. Car B suffers damage on the side door. Car A claims
it was stationary and that Car B was moving. However Car B claims that it was
stationary and that car A was moving.

Is there sufficient information here to reach a conclusion? If not what other
information is required?

Thank you for any input

J. Breslin
Jerome Breslin
jbreslin@pathcom.com

NOTE: You are reading in an archived session of ARnews. It is possible that this topic is still being discussed. To see if this topic is still active, or of there were any more recent posts on this topic, check later archives of ARnews.

If there is no current post, and you would like to add to this topic, link to the Current ARnews Discussion and begin a new thread. Be sure that if you are starting a new post that the thread title does not contain the abbreviation RE: Placing RE: at the beginning of a new post will confuse Hypermail and prevent others from answering your post in the future.

For example, to continue this discussion look for a thread titled

Prooving car was stationary

If this thread does not exist in the current archive, you can begin another one by using that title.